Part 2. Copyright on Songs. The Basics:
What Songs Can Have a Copyright? / Tangible Form



Part 2. Copyright on Songs. The Basics:
What Songs Can Have a Copyright? / Tangible Form.
by Sue Basko, esq.

This is part two of a four-part series. Please read all the parts. This is not legal advice and may not apply to your particular situation. You should consult with an attorney.

To go to the other lessons, click on them:

What Songs Can Have a Copyright?

To be eligible to have a copyright, a song must be:

1) Original;

2) Creative;

3) Set in tangible form.

Tangible Form - What is it?

Let's look at these three elements, starting with "tangible form." For copyright to exist, the work must be set into "tangible form." Tangible means that it can be touched. What does this mean in practice? It means that if you just think about a song, it does not have copyright. If you hum a song or sing a song, it does not have copyright. If you play a song on a guitar or piano, in front of a big audience, that still does not give it copyright.

You must set the song into tangible form. What does this mean, exactly?

LYRICS: You must write them on paper, or on a computer. They must be WRITTEN down someplace, by some means. OR you can RECORD them using an audio or video recorder. There must be a physical, tangible record of them that you could give to someone. That physical record might be digital and the means of giving it might be over the internet.

MUSIC: You must WRITE sheet music or notations. OR you must make a RECORDING of the music, either audio or video. This is the same as with the lyrics.

The production of the media used to create the tangible form does not have to be fancy. This means that you do not have to hire musicians and go into a studio. It means you can write the lyrics on a pad of paper and make a little recording at home.

So you see, if you have a decent home computer, you can easily type up the lyrics and make a little recording of the music. You will have the lyrics in a word file and the music as a file, usually a WAV, AIFF, or mp3 file. With the music in a computer file, you can easily register copyright online. I'll explain that in Lesson 4.

In the upcoming lessons, we'll look at "creative" and "original."

From this lesson, just remember:

For Copyright to exist on a song, it must be:
1) Original;
2) Creative; and
3) Set in tangible form.

And the most useful tangible forms for your purposes today will be to get your lyrics into a computer file word document and
your music into a computer audio file.
The types of files accepted by the Copyright Office are listed in Lesson 4.


Take care and I hope you will read all the lessons as I put them up here. -- Sue

CLICK HERE TO GO TO THE NEXT LESSON or use the Table of Contents on the right to find the page you wish to read next.





Part 3. Copyright on Songs. The Basics:
What Songs Can Have Copyright?/ Creative and Original



Part 3. Copyright on Songs. The Basics:
What Songs Can Have a Copyright? / Creative and Original
by Sue Basko

This is part 3 of a four-part series. Please read all the parts. This is not legal advice and may not apply to your particular situation. You should consult with an attorney.

To go to the other lessons, click on them:

What Songs Can Have a Copyright? What are: Creative and Original?

As explained in the prior lesson, to be eligible to have a copyright, a song must be:

1) Original;

2) Creative;

3) Set in tangible form.

In lesson 2, I told you what "tangible form" means. The song that you set into tangible form must be creative and original. In the context of copyright law, these two words are "terms of art," which means that they have specialized legal meanings that are different from the meaning in a ordinary dictionary. In everyday use, we may think of creative and original meaning about the same thing. In law, these are two very different meanings.

ORIGINAL - what it means.

Original means that the song must originate with you. There are three parts of a song on which copyright may be held -- lyrics (words), music, and arrangement. Copyright can also be held on the recording itself. The part on which you claim copyright must be your own work. That means you did not copy it from someone else.

Samples, loops, beats, remixes. Originality gets kind of tricky in this age of using samples and loops and beats and remixes. In most cases, if you use samples or loops or make remixes, the work will be a unique creation that is yours. However, you still must be certain that you have the right to use the sample or loop or make the remix, because in most cases, someone else owns the copyright to those elements.

Having something be your own work and being able to be protected by copyright are two different things, for you cannot violate someone else's copyright to obtain your own copyright. You must obtain the proper permission and licensing.

Sampling. A sample is a part of someone else's recorded song that is inserted into your song recording. To use a sample, you need 3 things:

1) You need to get Master Use Rights from the copyright owner of the recording you are sampling, which is usually the record company;

2) You will need permission from the song publisher;

2) You need a mechanical license for the recordings you will produce and distribute. This is the compulsory license that you pay at statutory rates, which is 9.1 cents per copy for songs 5 minutes and less.

FOR more information, see: Music Samples - How to Use Them Legally

Samples Re-recorded. Some artists want to use a sample of another artist's song, but instead of taking the original recording, they re-record it themselves or have studio musicians re-record the sample. To be on the safe side, the artist should still get the Master Use Rights from the master owner, and must still get permission from the publisher, AND obtain the compulsory license and pay the statutory royalty rates.

Remixes. A remix may be of one song or of a number of songs. Most remixes are bootleg and of dubious legality. If you are planning to sell a remix, you should consult with a music lawyer.

To make a legal remix, you need 3 things:

1) You need to get Master Use Rights from the owner of the copyright on the recording(s) you are remixing, which is usually a record company. This means you are asking permission from the record company of the original song to make the remix.

2) You need to get permission from the owner of the copyright on the music and lyrics of the song you are remixing, which is usually the publisher. This means you are asking permission from the publisher to make the remix.

3) You need a mechanical license for each of the songs in the remix. This is the compulsory license that you pay at statutory rates, which is 9.1 cents per copy for songs 5 minutes and less. For recordings over 5 minutes, the rate is 1.75 ¢ for each minute, rounded up. Remixes tend to be long and a lot of dance remixes blend many songs. If these are done legally, the royalties will be expensive.

Making a remix is very similar to using samples. So, it may help you to read this related blog post: Music Samples - How to Use Them Legally




Sometimes a music artist will arrange for a remix by giving the original tracks to a remix artist. In other words, they come to you, not vice versa. If you are the remix artist, get the agreement formalized in writing between you, the musician, the musician's recording company or record label, the musician's publisher, and any other party to the musician's copyright ownership. Try to be sure that you also have the right to sell the remix that you have created. And you will need to pay royalties on each remix sold.

Loops and Beats. Using loops or beats is a different matter. Most of these are created especially to be used in compositions, but are not part of any song, the way a sample is. People sell or license loops or beats. Be sure you have the right license for the way you are using it.

Loops and beats in ProTools and Garage Band. Many music artists use ProTools and Garage Band and such programs to create songs. Loops and beats are a great way to get the building blocks that you need to kickstart the creative process. If you buy a music program that comes with loops and beats, such as ProTools or Garage Band, that program comes with a license that tells how you can use the loops and beats. You must read this or have a lawyer read it for you to be sure that you are using it in an allowed way. In most cases, you can legally use the loops from these programs within your song and have full copyright ownership of your song. You cannot, however, re-sell the loops themselves.

Beat and Loop Artists. Beat or loop artists create original beats and loops. They license or sell these beats and loops. Usually a license will be for a certain number of copies sold. Sometimes it is an unlimited number of copies, but a nonexclusive license -- which means that same beat or loop can show up in the songs of many other musicians. An exclusive license means that the beat or loop is being given for your use only. An exclusive license is going to cost significantly more than a non-exclusive license and may require payment of points (percentages) on the sales.

Lawsuits for Copyright Infringement on Songs. Every now and then, a person will sue a major musical artist claiming that the artist "copied" their song. In my opinion, these lawsuits are almost always nuisance suits brought about by delusional individuals. In some cases, the person claims to have secretly written hundreds of wonderful songs, it just so happens they kept them all hidden from public hearing. And then, somehow, a famous person got ahold of the songs through some secretive means and copied them. I think lawyers who engage in bringing such suits are money-hungry bad guys trying to hammer money out of what they think is a big pockets defendant. Coldplay has been the target of several such lawsuits, each more annoying than the next.

Protections for Legitimate Songwriters. If you are a legitimate songwriter and you want to protect your original songs, simply do the following: register the copyright on your songs, register your songs with a PRO (performing rights organization) such as ASCAP or BMI, record your songs, perform your songs, sell your songs online, and make the best use of your songs that you can. Realize that the world of music feeds off common themes of sound and words. Realize that some songs will share similarities to your songs. Realize that you are not alone in the world. And continue to create. You are sharing part of a common musicality, and hearing familiar sounds or words should not lead you to think someone is stealing your work or invading your brain and that you must file a lawsuit. Seriously, that stuff is crazy and annoying.

If however, someone else actually has recorded your exact same song on which you have registered copyright and filed with a PRO, and has done so without buying a statutory license, then write them a letter about it or have a lawyer do that for you, and/or contact the licensing agency.


CREATIVE - what it means.

For a song to be eligible for copyright, it must be creative, original, and set into tangible form. We have already looked at the meanings of original and tangible form. Creative is a legal term of art particular to copyright law. Creative means that there is an artistic arranging of elements to create a cohesive whole. It means that what is made is not "stock."

The determination of whether a song meets the legal criteria for "creativity" will come about only in a lawsuit for copyright infringement. For example, suppose an unknown songwriter claimed that he wrote a song with the lyrics: "Ooooh baby, I need you," and that a famous singer copied those lyrics. To get past a motion for summary judgement ( a court motion that ends the court case before it gets rolling), the plaintiff (person filing the suit) would have to show that the defendant (person being sued) had access to the plaintiff's lyrics. Then, the plaintiff would have to prove that the defendant's lyrics were similar. If the plaintiff could prove these two points -- access and similarity, the lawsuit would still likely fail, because "Ooooh baby, I need you," are not creative lyrics, but are lyrics of a stock quality in rock music.

The same goes for standard musical phrasings, chord changes, bass riffs, etc. Many of these are stock in the musical genre of folk, rock, pop, hip-hop, etc.

The Copyright Office does not check your music or lyrics to determine if they are "creative." However, if you ever were to sue anyone for copyright infringement, you better make sure first that what you are claiming as your own creativity is not simply part of the common stock of the genre.

From today's lesson, remember:
For a song to be eligible for copyright, it must be:
1) Creative;
2) Original;
3) Set in tangible form.




Take care and I hope you will read all the lessons as I put them up here. -- Sue

CLICK HERE TO GO TO THE NEXT LESSON or use the Table of Contents on the right to find the page you want to read next.




Music Samples:
How to Use Them Legally




Music Samples: How to Use Them Legally
by Sue Basko, esq.

Know from the start: Using samples legally is NOT an easy process. This is the kind of thing you really ought to pay a lawyer to do for you. In fact, many record companies and publishers will only deal with a lawyer. 

Still, read on about the process involved:

Samples are pieces of existing recorded songs that are incorporated into a new song.

Someone owns the copyright on that recording. That is probably a record company. The songwriter(s) or their publisher own the copyright on the underlying intellectual property, which is the songwriting on the music and lyrics.

To use a sample legally, you need to do 3 things:

1) You need to get Master Use Rights from the copyright owner of the recording you are sampling. This is most likely a record company. This means you are asking the record company for permission to use the sample.

HOW TO DO THIS: You need to look and see what record company made the recording. Then you need to locate that company and contact them and ask for permission to use the sample. If it is an old recording, it can be very complicated to locate the copyright owner, especially if the record company no longer exists. The R.I.A.A. may be able to help you.

The record company will want to know exactly which part you want to use and how you want to use it. The record company can say no. If they say no, you can recreate the sample you want to use by obtaining the compulsory licensing, re-recording the part of the song you want to use, and paying statutory royalties on each recording you sell.

Why they might tell you no: Because they find you or your proposed song use offensive. Because they think you might cause people to buy your song rather than the original song. Because they have given permission to someone else to use the sample exclusively.

2) You need to get permission from the song publisher. The song publisher is the company that represents the songwriter. Some songwriters self-publish. The song publisher will want to know exactly how you plan to use the sample, and will want to know all the lyrics on the song you plan to record. They will likely reject using the sample in any song that uses profanities. Also, if you as an artist have a reputation that is objectionable, the publisher is likely to refuse your request. The publisher may want to hear a mock-up recording of what you plan to record in the studio.

The publisher/ songwriter can say no. Why they might tell you no: Because they find you or your proposed song use offensive. They might also want you to be represented by a lawyer. They might also find your approach unprofessional or think you are flaky or risky. For example, if you send them a screwy letter with misspellings and they barely know what you are talking about, they will likely reject your request. Also, if they have any reason to suspect you are not dealing on the up-and-up, they might reject your request. Also, if you have an agenda or viewpoint that they do not want to be associated with, they will reject your request.

If the publisher/ songwriter tells you no, then you cannot use the sample, or it will be very risky to do so. Why? Because the songwriter can sue you for copyright infringement for "unauthorized release of an altered version of the song." If the song goes to other nations, the songwriter might be able to sue you for violation of their artist moral rights, or droite morale.

Always be aware that if someone with a lot of money wants to sue you, they will find a basis on which to do so. That does not mean they will win, but it is more common to outspend in a lawsuit than to actually win.

HOW TO LOCATE THE PUBLISHER: You will need to locate the publisher of the song.  You might be able to find the publisher on the Harry Fox database.  You can search for the song on the PROs (performing rights organizations) databases and the copyright office database to try to find this information. Here are links to those sites:


Once you have located the publisher, you must call them and tell them you want to sample the song. They will tell you how they want you to apply to do so, and what they will require in your application. Most likely, they will want a letter that explains in detail how you will use the sample.

Some publishers have a website where they let you apply to use a sample, or let you apply for any other sort of license for the songs in their repertoire.  If you can find a website, use that because it will save time. 

You can also hire a clearance company or a lawyer to find the publisher and try to get clearance to use the sample. If you can afford this, it is certainly worth the money.   This would be the sort of clearance company that is used to get rights to use a bit of a song in a movie.  You can contact such companies and ask if they will try to do clearance on a music sample for use in a new song.  They might offer this service and they might not.  Many clearance companies only deal with synch licensing, that is licensing to use a part of a song in a motion picture, such as a movie, TV show, or commercial.

3) You also need a mechanical license to use the sample of the song in the recordings you will produce and distribute. This is the compulsory license that you pay at statutory rates, which is 9.1 cents per copy for songs 5 minutes and less. This means that for every copy of the song you sell, you will be paying money to the songwriter from the sample.

HOW TO DO THIS: Some songs are listed with the Harry Fox Agency, which will issue you a limited quantity license for song recordings that will be produced and distributed within the United States. This service is called "Song File. " Harry Fox charges at $15.00 processing fee per song and the royalty fees for the number of copies you estimate you will sell.

You can also use other companies, such as easysonglicensing.com

The Harry Fox Songfile service can only be used for song recordings that will be produced and sold in the U.S. If the recording is going to be produced or sold outside the U.S., you need to contact the publisher directly. If you are selling online, please note the reach of the online store you are using. For example, Itunes has Itunes stores specifically for the U.S., UK, Japan, etc. Therefore, it seems safe to use Harry Fox for the mechanical licenses for songs recorded in the U.S. that will be sold on Itunes U.S.

If the song is not listed with Harry Fox, or if it will be sold internationally, or if you prefer, you can locate the publisher or copyright owner of the song yourself or ask the Copyright Office to do so. You then serve a Notice of Intention to Obtain a Compulsory License on the copyright owner (song publisher, usually) or authorized agent of the owner by certified or registered mail. You can find instructions on how to do this at the this link for the Copyright Office.

Samples Re-recorded. Some artists want to use a sample of another artist's song, but instead of taking the original recording, they re-record it themselves or have studio musicians re-record the sample. The artist must still get permission from the copyright owner of the song, which is the publisher or songwriter, and also must obtain the compulsory license and pay the statutory royalty rates. KEEP IN MIND that the song publisher DOES NOT have to allow you to use a sample of the song.

Also, please keep in mind that you might still be sued by the record company that owns the original recording of the song, on some basis or other. That is why, if you want to avoid lawsuits, you should seek also seek permission from the record company, even if you will not be using their recording. If they have said no to you request to use the original recording, it is an indicator that they will find some basis to object to you recreating the sample.  For example, they might claim the part you sampled was not part of the originally written song, but rather, that is was created in the studio during their recording session.  And this might be true.

CREDITS. This question came to me via email: If I get permission to use the sample and I pay the royalties, do I still have to give credit in the liner notes? Yes, you should always give credit in any situation where you can give credit. The permissions you will get from the record company and the publisher will spell out how they want you to give credit. If it is not spelled out, still do it.

One of the saddest things about Itunes is that there are no credits for songwriter, musicians, etc,, as you see on CD and vinyl. I wish Itunes would change this, at least for the music submitters that would like to include this information.

Lawsuits. Please be aware that the use of samples has led to many lawsuits, many of which have been settled with big payments. In one such lawsuit, a band called The Verve had a very popular recording called "Bittersweet Symphony." Do you remember it? In it, they used a sample from a symphonic cover of a Rolling Stones song. The string part was never in the recording made by the Rolling Stones, but was part of the cover version recorded by the symphony. The Verve was forced to pay all of their royalties over to Mick Jagger and Keith Richards. This is why you must get permission not only from the owner of the recording you are sampling, but also from the owner of the underlying intellectual property (the song), which is the song publisher/ songwriter.

Your goal should be to avoid lawsuits. Lawsuits are expensive, time-consuming, and can hold up your money-making and creative processes. A big lawsuit can end your music career.

If you use a sample and you make any money or appear to be making money, you will become a target for a lawsuit. You must be prepared. Keep in mind that although the U.S. courts have allowed some usage of sampling without the publisher's permission, it is very easy for music to travel outside the bounds of U.S. jurisdiction. In fact, most music on the internet is available worldwide. Therefore, if you want to be somewhat safer from lawsuits, seek the two permissions listed and be sure to give full credits for use of the sample and pay the royalties.

If you do not have permission from the publisher, and the song goes to other nations, the songwriter might be able to sue you for violation of their artist moral rights, or droite morale.

Always be aware that if someone with a lot of money wants to sue you, they will find a basis on which to do so. That does not mean they will win, but it is more common to outspend in a lawsuit than to actually win.

Keep in mind that some people and some companies rarely sue and are more into sharing. Other people or companies are known to sue over the slightest things and have been known to economically destroy small music artists. For example, it is often said that the Rolling Stones' book of songs has been highly litigated by its publishers. Keep in mind that if a copyright infringement is claimed, you can be sued for a great deal of money, even if you made little or no money or even if you charged no money.

To sum up -- to legally use a sample, you need permission from at least two sources -- the owner of the copyright on the recording and the owner of the copyright on the underlying intellectual property, that is the owner of the publishing (music and lyrics). Neither has to give you permission and they can set limits and charge as they please.

USING A SAMPLE FROM A MOVIE:

Question: I have an audio recording I produced myself. It's a 30 minute electronic music mix. I want to know how to ask permission to use a sample from a film which I have used within this recording before I publish this recording of mine.

Answer: If the sample is sounds from the film, such as talking, sound effects, etc., then you have to contact the owner of the film and see if they will let you use it. That is going to take some hunting down, but look at the credits or check the credits on IMDB pro. (They often have free 2 week memberships.) www.imdb.com

It can often be hard to tell who it is exactly that would be able to give permission, but your best bet is to talk to the LEGAL DEPT of the company that owns the film.

They will probably tell you no. At that point, you can decide if you MUST have this in your song. Maybe you can create an original piece that has the same vibe without using the same words or names and record it and add SFX to make it sound like it is coming from a movie.

For example, you can write dialogue and record SFX that have a similar vibe, but that do not infringe upon the copyright of the movie. It is very easy to use filters in Garage Band or ProTools to make it sound like it comes from a movie.

If they tell you no and you use it, you are violating copyright and they can sue you. If it is a film registered under U.S. Copyright, they can sue you and there is a fine involved, even if you made no money on your song. The fine can be $150,000. That is a whole lot of money.

So you do not want to violate copyright owned by a rich company with a big legal department with time on their hands to sue you.

If it is a song from the film, and if it is the recording of the song you want to use and not the recording of the film itself, then that is a matter of getting permission as with any sample -- from the songwriter/ publisher as well as from the owner of the recording itself.

But if you are taking a recording of a song from a film, then you need ALL of these permissions -- the film company, owner of the song master, and songwriter/ publisher. And they will tell you no, most surely -- mainly because there will be no one that has the authority to give you this right, and you do not have enough money to pay a big fee to convince them to allow it. Money and fame talk, and if you have either, you can possibly get them to say yes.

You may also be interested to read Cover Songs - Performing and Recording Them Legally.


Using Songs in a Film Legally:
Synch Rights PART 2:
Music Licensors



Using Songs in a Film Legally - Synch Rights PART 2
Music Licensors
By Sue Basko, esq.


WHAT ABOUT MUSIC LICENSORS? Today, there are hundreds or thousands of companies that say they are doing music licensing. They have a library of songs and will sell you the right to use a song, in whole or in part, in your film. I suggest only using the very few top notch companies that are working with top notch musicians likely to be represented by a lawyer and doing their legal paperwork correctly.

Why? Because most of these companies obtain their music in slipshod ways, and the likelihood of having clear title to the song is very slim. I have read dozens of these contracts. Most of these contracts appear not to be written by a lawyer. Many of the contracts seem like they were ripped off the internet or borrowed from someone else. Many of the contracts barely make any sense. In many cases, the licensor has no personal relationship with and no particular knowledge of the musician. And the musician has signed the contract without having it read first by a lawyer. In sum, there is a bunch of stuff going on, none of it is particularly legally proper, and the chance of it resulting in clear title is most unlikely.

The music clearance that you hold is only as good as all the underlying legal work, starting with the songwriter on out.

MOST of these licensing companies do absolutely no checking on the ownership of the copyright on the intellectual property of the song or of the sound recording. They have the person that hands them the music sign a release form. And that is all there is to it. There is no due diligence whatsoever. And the musician has no clue what they are signing.

My guess is that most musicians signing over their songs do not know what they are signing. Many or most musicians that work without a lawyer or formal publishing company do not do their own legal work properly at all.

This problem is compounded by a lot of small publishers, record labels, studios, and even promoters, who take rights to songs without even having any particular capacity to do anything with the music. These little companies almost never have their legal work done properly, and in many cases, the musicians does not know what the deal is.

Rightly, there should be a fiduciary duty that attaches with the right to call oneself a publisher or record label, but such a duty will only be enforced if the musician insists upon it. Anyone can call their business a publisher or record label or promoter, and they can provide any service or no service. There are no legal definitions. If one takes rights on a song, there might be a fiduciary duty to attempt to exploit the song for monetary gain for yourself and the song creator and to collect royalties or licensing fees and pay a percentage to the songwriter and/or copyright holder on the song. In fact, the contract probably waives any such duty. The widespread reality is that musicians turn their music over to people that simply stockpile it.

In fact, to be blunt -- most independent musicians sign things without knowing what they are signing. Most music licensors collect music without really knowing if they are actually securing the rights to it. And most musicians do not even know if or when they do fully own the rights to music. And into this mess, you, the filmmaker, step.

If, in your film, you use a song or part of a song to which you do not have proper clearance, this can keep you from getting distribution. If you do get distribution, the film may have to be recalled. You can be sued or forced to pay. You may end out having to re-edit. In short, having an improperly cleared song can break your new film career.

Possible problems that you may encounter include:
  • there may be a songwriting partner or participant who is never mentioned and who does not even know of the deal;
  • there may be a band member -- or all band members -- who have not been compensated for their work, and/or do not know about the deal;
  • there many a studio or producer owning rights on the recording;
  • the person or another person may have signed publishing or licensing rights on the song over to someone else already. It is not unheard of for a musician to sign an "exclusive" contract and then go and sign other "exclusive" deals. They may have no idea what "exclusive" means;
  • the song may not really be the work of the person saying it is their work. For example, the song may contain unlicensed samples or beats. Or the samples and beats may be licensed for mechanicals only and not for synch;
  • In some cases, it is not even their song or recording, but they may represent it as being such. I have heard people say they "worked on" something, only to find out they are friends or cousins with someone who knows someone in the band;
  • Independent musicians without lawyers are known to sign lots of things without knowing what they are signing. The company with which they have signed may assert their rights.
  • Other times, one songwriter may be screwing over another songwriter. Or one band member may screw over other band members. This happens more than it should. There is no ethical training required to be in a rock band.
TO SUM UP:
If you are going to use a music licensing company, use only a top-notch company. Things that will tip you off: real people, a real location, real working phone numbers. A high quality website written using correct spelling and grammar. A website where the photos are sized right, there is a music player, things look good. Then, do some digging. Ask a music lawyer. Remember -- the integrity and usability of your film is jeopardized if you get music from sources where it is not really legally clear to use.

Using Songs in a Film Legally - Synch Rights



Using Songs in a Film Legally - Synch Rights
by Sue Basko

After reading this, also read:

Using a song in a film is called synchronization, or synch. To use a song, you must have synch rights. To get this, you need to go to at least two parties and get their permission and bargain with them for a price. The two parties are: 1) the person that owns the recording, such as the music artist or record label; and 2) the songwriters or their publisher/ representative or whatever entity or entities own the underlying intellectual property, that is, the song lyrics and music. You can also get a clearance company to do this for you, but then you are paying the company a good service fee to negotiate and contract on your behalf. I think it makes a LOT of sense to pay this fee, because the process is complex.

If it is an independent artist, they might own the song publishing rights and the recording. But "might" is the key word here. If they do own the whole thing, this can make it much easier for you to get clearance -- if everything they tell you is actually the way it is. You need to ask, but you should also double-check some databases. If you plan to show or distribute the film, you should do all this carefully and get insurance to cover it, too.

Independent musicians sometimes fail to list all the songwriters as copyright holders. Some of them do not know any better. Some think it is every man for himself and whoever is paying to register only registers their own ownership. Others may register this way intentionally to try to claim full ownership. There is nothing saying independent musicians are all nice guys and gals.

Independent musicians also sometimes either obscure the fact or simply do not understand that their recording may be owned or controlled at least in part by a past record label or a producer or studio to whom they have assigned some ownership. Some of these people sign such contracts without even knowing what they are signing, or conveniently ignore it later. Sometimes the indie musicians have even signed an exclusive licensing deal and yet are out bargaining for other deals, without realizing they cannot legally do so. They simply do not understand what "exclusive" means.

So, while it is usually easier and cheaper to get songs from an independent artist, it can also be risky. Check things out and if your gut tells you something is not quite right, listen.

Do the song owners have to say yes? No, they can say no. Granting permission is totally at their option and they set the price.

EXAMPLE: Let's say you want to use the song, "Hey There Delilah," and you want to use the recording by the pop rock group, Plain White Ts.

First, we go to the U.S. Copyright Office Website. Do a search on the words, Hey There Delilah. Two apt entries come up, but both are for the sound recordings, but perhaps also with the songwriting included. All band members are named as co-writers with Tom Higgenson. Then we see the song has been assigned to WB Music Corporation & Fearless Records. A little digging on the site links, and the name of Warner Chappell publishing comes up. Warner Chappell lists only Tom Higgenson as the songwriter. So, we go to the Warner Chappell website. We do a title search and see the company owns the publishing and Warner owns the masters. On the site, we can register as a user and then apply for a mechanical license, a print license, or a synch license.

To apply for a synch license, we must fill out an online form. The form asks:

Name of person or entity seeking to license the song - and all contact information

The name of the production - such as the name of the film, video, or TV show

Synopsis - brief synopsis of the entire show as well as its length

Total Budget/ Music Budget

Project Type - Commercial, Film, Internet, Karaoke, In house/Corporate Use, Performing Rights, Promo, Stage, TV, Trailer, Video, Video Game, Other.

Media: Here they ask you to describe the media type chosen above. If it's for YouTube, they want your YouTube ID#. If you are making videos or DVDs, they want to know how many and the retail price.

Term: How long you want to use the license. Obviously, the longer, the more expensive. The options start at one day, one week, etc. and go in increments to 10 years, and then jump to perpetuity. Film Festival usage is capped at 2 years.

The company will use all this information to allow or deny the song usage, and to set a price. Sometimes more information will be requested. Factors that will come into consideration include your reputation, if the project sounds like something they want to be associated with, your budget, and other plans they have pending. Keep in mind, they do not have to allow you to use the song.

Be especially cognizant of how you present yourself. If the usage is for youtube, they want your youtube ID number so they can look at your page, your other videos, how you present yourself, If you seem talented and creative, your fan base, your hit count, etc. In other words: Do they want to be associated with you?

What if the publisher says Yes, but the owner of the sound recording says No? If the person or entity that owns the recording tells you no or sets too high a price, but the songwriter/publisher tells you yes, you may be able to use a recording of the same song by someone else that does say yes. This means you are using a cover song -- a cover of the original song. In fact, maybe you can use a cover of the same song for a lot less, and it might even have a style that better suits your needs. One way to find covers of well-known songs is to go onto Itunes and search by song name. Since these cover artists are selling on Itunes, you know they are currently active and engaged in the music business. If you click on the song, you should be able to find out some small amount of information, such as the artist's name and/or record label. You can proceed from there to locate the recording artist and see if you can secure synch licensing on the song sound recording. (Keep in mind, you still need permission from the songwriter/ publisher.)

Or, if there is no cover or none that you like, can make your own new recording of the song or of the part of the song that you want to use in the film. For example, if you plan to use 10 seconds of a song, you may want to save time and money by only recording 20 seconds or so of the song, adding the extra seconds to be sure you have enough. Keep in mind that you need to get the statutory mechanical license to record the song. And you still need clearance from the songwriter/ publisher for the synch license. You should really consult with a lawyer if you are considering re-recording a song for use in a film based on not getting permission from the owner of the original recording.

You can also commission a cover by an artist whose style you like. In that case, you need a lot of legal work done. You will need a mechanical license from the songwriter/publisher, a synch license from the songwriter/publisher, and a contract with the commissioned artist that allows you to use the song in the film, in any soundtrack CD or downloads, and divides up who will be given what payments or royalties. You should really get a lawyer to do this.

REMEMBER - Even if you are recording your own cover of a song, you NEED to get permission from the song publisher (or copyright owner) to use the song in a film. This means you are getting a Synch License from the owner of the intellectual property -- the music and lyrics. And you will be bargaining to get that permission and for that price. In addition, you will also need to get a mechanical license to create your cover of the song -- and this is statutory -- I tell you how to get this in the post that tells how to legally record a cover song.

How Much will the song owners charge? This is a negotiated deal between the song owners and the filmmaker. It depends on lots of things: the filmmaker's budget, what kind of film, if the song owners believe the film will bring good exposure and publicity to the song or to them, if the song is owned by a big music corporation or by an individual musician, etc. Usually, it is a lot easier to get clearances from and much more inexpensive to use music from an independent artist. If you are a low budget, independent artists are a good source of affordable music.

What is not related? The world of music law and business is quite complex. Synch rights are not performing rights and are therefore not controlled by the performing rights organizations, or PROs - ASCAP, BMI, SESAC. Synch rights are also not mechanical rights, and are not handled by Harry Fox. Synch rights are not statutorily controlled. Getting synch rights is a private negotiated deal between the filmmaker and the song owners.

HOW CAN I FIND OUT WHO IS THE PUBLISHER? Many songwriters register their songs with the U.S. Copyright Office, and/or with one of the PROs - performing rights organizations, namely ASCAP, BMI, or SESAC. Below are links to those organizations, so you can search their databases. If a publishing company is not listed, the songwriter probably self-publishes. You can contact the PRO and ask for the publisher contact information. YOU ARE JUST GETTING CONTACT INFORMATION HERE -- THESE PLACES DO NOT HANDLE SYNCH RIGHTS!

At the Copyright Office, you can search online or you can pay the Copyright Office to search for you.

When you are looking for the songwriters of a particular song, you may find that the co-writers on a given song may be represented by different PROs, or may have different publishing companies. There may even be U.S. PROs and foreign PROs, and publishing companies scattered about the globe, all for one song. This is especially so for groups from the UK where one or more of the members now reside in the U.S. But, even with an American rock band, you may see that some songs are with one PRO, perhaps one the songwriters were with in their early days. The songwriters may have since signed on to a new PRO, but the songs may not have followed them. Likewise, a publisher may have signed one band member as a songwriter, but may not have signed all the band members. For all these reasons, filmmakers are often wise to hire a clearance company or lawyer to do this work.


HOW CAN I FIND OUT WHO OWNS THE RECORDING? You can hire an experienced professional, such as a lawyer or clearance company, to do this for you. It will be quite time-consuming and detailed. Or if you are meticulous with detail and law, you might attempt to do it on your own. However, your Errors and Omissions insurance may require you to have your clearances done by a professional and doing otherwise may invalidate the insurance. If you do not have your clearances done properly and/or do not have proper insurance, your film cannot be displayed or distributed.

If it is an independent artist, the recording may be owned by the artist. You can ask when you locate the songwriter or publisher. Otherwise, look on the CD, record jacket, Itunes page, or whatever, and see if it comes from a record company. Hunt and look up the record company and contact them. If you have a CD, the address might be on the label. If it is a big U.S. label, you should be able to get assistance from the R.I.A.A., The Recording Industry Association of America.